Colegio Alberto Einstein · DP Music · Grade 11

Trimester 3 Study Guide

Romantic Music — Theory, Writing & Reflection
Exam: June 12, 2026 · 120 minutes

This is not a practice exam. It is a list of things you need to be able to think through on your own before June 12. For every concept here, ask yourself: can I explain this without looking it up? If you can’t — that’s what to study.

SectionFocusTimePoints
1Theory & Notation35 min30 pts
2Romantic Era Essays (×3)30 min30 pts
3Historical Foundation & Recording20 min12 pts
4Year-End Reflection20 min17 pts
5Glossary (×12)15 min12 pts
Total120 min101 pts
S1 Theory & Notation

What to review

This section tests your ability to work with musical information quickly and accurately — no ambiguity in the answers, just whether you know your stuff or you don’t. Review:

  • Scale structure — degree names and numbers in major and minor; modes and their relationship to parent major scales; the difference between relative and parallel
  • Chord function and secondary harmony — identifying diatonic chords by function and writing the dominant seventh chord that resolves to any of them, in lead-sheet symbols
  • Voice motion — all four types, and the distinction between the ones that are errors and the ones that aren’t
  • Cadences — the progressions, the names, and what each one does to the listener’s sense of closure
  • Voice leading — the rules that governed SATB writing, what problems they were designed to prevent, and how to identify and fix a violation

How to study it

These aren’t concepts to memorize — they’re skills to practice. The difference: if you need to look something up to answer, you don’t know it yet.

Pick a key at random. Can you name any scale degree, build any diatonic chord, find its secondary dominant, and describe how a voice-leading problem in that chord’s resolution would appear — all without help? That’s the level this section requires.
S2 Romantic Era — Written Analysis

What to review

Three written responses, each asking you to make an argument about Romantic music using your investigation as evidence. Review the following areas — not as a list of facts, but as things you can actually talk about:

  • Romantic harmonic language — the techniques composers used to go beyond the diatonic system, what each one sounds like, and what it does expressively that purely diatonic writing cannot
  • Sound as expression — how register, timbre, texture, dynamics, tempo, articulation, and rubato shape meaning in Romantic music; what the composer writes and what the performer decides
  • Romantic vs. Classical — what Romantic composers rejected, complicated, or expanded from the Classical tradition, and why; what values drove those choices

How to study it

Your investigation is your evidence for all three responses. Before the exam, know your piece well enough to describe a specific passage — not the piece in general — using precise musical vocabulary.

The difference between a 5 and a 9 on these questions isn’t knowing more facts. It’s whether your answer makes an actual argument — one that uses specific evidence to reach a conclusion — rather than describing or listing. Before you write, know what you’re trying to say.
S3 Historical Foundation & Recording

What to review

  • Acoustic principles and Western harmony — how physics relates to the way tonal music developed; how Romantic composers worked within and against that tradition
  • The history of dissonance — the rules about which intervals and motions were avoided in Western counterpoint, the reasoning behind them, and how that tradition evolved over time
  • Stereo recording — what a stereo waveform shows, how microphone placement affects what you hear in each channel, and how to read an imbalance

Waveform Practice

One question on this exam gives you a stereo waveform image and asks you to interpret it. Here are two examples — look at them and make sure you understand what you’re seeing before the exam.

A stereo waveform shows two channels — L and R — stacked vertically. The height (amplitude) of each channel reflects the signal level on that side. In a well-recorded ensemble, you’d expect a reasonable balance between the two.

✓ Balanced
⚠ Balance Issue
What do you notice about the two examples above? For the one with the balance issue: what does that imbalance tell you about how the sound source and microphone pair were positioned? And more generally — what does a source’s physical position relative to the microphone pair determine in the stereo image, and why does that matter for how a listener hears the recording?
S4 Year-End Reflection

What this asks

A longer written response — 8 to 12 sentences — looking back across the whole year, not just this term. You’ll use the IB Areas of Inquiry as a lens.

  • AOI 1 — Music for sociocultural and political expression
  • AOI 2 — Music as a listening experience
  • AOI 3 — Music for entertainment and recreation
  • AOI 4 — Music technology

How to study it

The prompt asks you to reflect on your development as a musician and as a DP Music student. Responses that earn high marks are grounded in specific work you actually did — pieces, recordings, arrangements, analyses, performances — and use musical vocabulary precisely.

Before the exam: know which 2–3 pieces of your own work from this year you can write about in detail. Know what changed in how you think or hear music, and be able to point to a specific moment or concept where that shift happened. Vague statements about enjoying music or wanting to improve will not earn points. Specific musical evidence will.
S5 Vocabulary

What to review

Twelve terms drawn from across all three trimesters — harmony, rhythm, texture, historical practice, and technology. One point each.

The terms come from concepts we’ve used throughout the year: how music is organized harmonically, how it moves in time, how it’s structured across voices, how historical and non-Western traditions organize pitch differently, and how recordings capture sound.

How to study it

Don’t memorize definitions. If you can only recite a phrase you looked up, that’s not understanding — and a regurgitated definition earns less than one that’s clearly in your own words.

For each term you’ve encountered this year: can you use it in a sentence about actual music — something you heard, played, or studied? Can you explain why the concept matters, not just what it is? If you can do that, you know the term. If you can only define it, keep reviewing.